StackHawk workflow
Developer-first runtime testing
StackHawk’s published material describes developer-configured runtime testing across local development, CI/CD, staging, and production.
Eresus Guard vs StackHawk
StackHawk’s cited material describes runtime testing in developer workflows. Eresus Guard uses project-scoped assessments with finding and evidence review in Workbench.
Public-source review:
Compare the published workflows.
Eresus Guard workflow
Evidence-first AppSec operations
Eresus Guard organizes authorized assessments with project-based finding triage and evidence review.
Product details side by side
| Decision area | StackHawk | Eresus Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow | Its published material describes runtime testing across CI/CD, staging, local development, and production. | Authorized application and API assessments run through a cloud Workbench for scanning, triage, and evidence review. |
| Scan configuration | The cited source describes stackhawk.yml configuration-as-code and hosted configuration. | Assessment setup and review stay with the project workspace and its evidence. |
| Finding reproduction | The cited source says findings include the triggering request and response. | Findings retain HTTP Records, OAST Interactions, and assessment context for review. |
| Coverage context | The published material describes discovery of source-connected applications and APIs before runtime tests. | The Workbench supports DAST, SAST, and software-composition review in one application-security workspace. |
| Evaluation focus | Teams can evaluate its runtime-testing workflow when they prefer developer-owned configuration. | AppSec teams and service providers can evaluate one workspace for scans, findings, and evidence. |
Sources and review date
This page summarizes StackHawk’s linked product material and Eresus Guard’s documented scope. Use the sources below to check current details during procurement.
StackHawk statements are based on StackHawk: How Does StackHawk Work?. Product details can change, so review the linked source during procurement.
Common evaluation questions
Is Eresus Guard a StackHawk replacement?
The workflows overlap in dynamic testing. StackHawk’s cited material describes runtime tests configured in developer workflows. Eresus Guard organizes authorized assessment, triage, and evidence review in Workbench.
Do both products support dynamic testing of running applications?
Both products test running applications, based on the linked product material. StackHawk describes local, CI/CD, staging, and production workflows. Eresus Guard organizes authorized web and API assessments in Workbench.
Review your assessment workflow with Eresus Security.
Share your scope, authentication, and evidence needs when you request access.